“OLVIA-PRESS”
As
the information agency “Olvia-press” has already informed, at the meeting of
representatives of Dniestria, Moldova, Russia, the Ukraine, and OSCE, that had
taken place in Kiev, mediators and of the Dniestrian settlement planned to hold
the next round of negotiations in August 2002 in Kishinev. And it should have
been held in the neutral territory: in embassies of Russia, the Ukraine, and
the OSCE Mission. Since then, in the mass media many rumors and assumptions
have been spread regarding the date and agenda of the next meeting of the
parties.
But as the Dniestrian experts’ group
representatives exacted to the “Olvia-press”, Kiev agreements and the existing
practice suppose that initiative of determining the concrete date of the
meeting, its program and agenda as well belongs to the mediators: Russia, the
Ukraine, and OSCE. The next meeting of the parties within frames of permanent
convention on the Moldavian-Dniestria settlement will thus take place only
after respective invitation from the mediators. There was no such invitation
yet.
Nevertheless,
this week it became known that the President of Moldova Vladimir Voronin sent
to representatives of Russia, the Ukraine, OSCE, and Dniestria, an official
proposal to hold negotiations of the plenipotentiary representatives of all the
5 parties on August 15th. The Moldavian President thus unilaterally
determined the date of meeting having taking functions of mediator and
guarantee country upon himself, and tried to violate the existing mechanisms of
quanta-lateral relationship.
The
experts’ group of Dniestria, where the agency “Olvia-press” correspondent
addressed with request of comments, appreciated that step as non-contributing to
enforcement of trust between the parties. In the experts’ opinion, the attempt
of V. Voronin to thrust his decision on the negotiation participants without
preliminary conditions may just add a negative feature to the political
portrait of the Moldavian President. As the experts remarked, the Dniestrian
side, remaining open for constructive dialogue, considers that success of the
meeting is directly connected with non-deviate respect of existing forms and
mechanisms of the parties’ interaction, and expects respective initiative from
the mediators.
***** August 14th 2002 *****